Interview: Paul Giamatti talks tone, murderous toe fungus and dirty towels with Film School Rejects

Film School Rejects nabbed a fantastic interview with Paul Giamatti. Paul’s Cosmopolis character, Benno Levin, is one strange dude and it’s surreal stuff when Paul tries to explain him. If you’ve seen the film you know the towel is a big deal and the fungus… well, like Eric said, don’t make us laugh. A murderous, talking, toe fungus shouldn’t be this funny.😉 The discussion about the tone of Cosmopolis and Paul’s role prep is also great. We’ve excerpted the Cosmopolis bits but head over to Film School Rejects for the full interview.

Cosmopolis fits quite nicely in actor Paul Giamatti‘s wheelhouse. Like the over-the-top Shoot’Em Up, the ridiculously bloody Ironclad, and this year’s John Dies at the End, Giamatti is more than willing to jump into a world with no ceiling. Or, as Giamatti and the British say, to get “wet.” Wet is certainly what Giamatti gets in director David Cronenberg‘s Cosmopolis. Rarely does Giamatti speak a line which isn’t abstract or approaching any level of sanity in the film.

Key point: Giamatti’s character’s towel and fungus. In the film, a sweaty and disgruntled Giamatti emotionally clings onto a dirty towel and speaks of a fungus between his toes urging him to kill. Countless interpretations could be applied to their actual meaning, but, clearly, Giamatti has his own explanations, explanations that even the actor wouldn’t fully discuss.

Here’s what actor Paul Giamatti had to say about working with David Cronenberg, the film’s straight-faced wackiness, and why he won’t tell you what the towel means:

The tone of Cosmopolis is this very straight-faced, serious type of wacky. How did Cronenberg describe the tone to you?

You know, he didn’t, in a lot of ways. I think he just trusted we’d get a sense of it. Even though the dialogue is very odd, you know what his sensibility is anyway, so you kind of know what the tone is. I did something I don’t normally do on a movie…I just came in at the end, after they shot most of the movie, and I asked David if I could watch the footage, because I wanted to see the tone of the movie and what Rob looked like, talked like, and moved like. I felt it was something I needed to see, because I’m playing a guy who always has a fantasy of him in his head. I did ask to see the footage for exactly what you just said: it’s an odd tone. I wanted to just watch some of it, so I could see how I could fit into it and, in some ways, veer off of it.

Cronenberg is known for a certain kind of tone, but he’s been pretty diverse. When you work with a filmmaker who is known for a certain vibe, do you go in with preconceptions about what the performance may require or do you go in completely fresh?

That’s interesting…yeah, you do. I don’t find myself ever consciously thinking about what else he’s done. There is a certain reason you’re doing it, because of those other things, so you have a bit of that in there. In this instance, I wasn’t disappointed. I was, like, “Right, this feels like a Cronenberg movie!” [Laughs] I think if you have a great, strong director like this, you’re going to catch on very quickly to what he’s trying to do. Very quickly you’re going to know if it’s going to feel good and very quickly he’ll suck you into the right world. Because of that, you’re not even going to notice if you’re in a movie that feels different from the other Cronenberg movies.

It is similar to a few of his previous film in how abstract the story can be at times. When you get a script this dense and full of symbolism, do you try to apply meaning to everything or do you just go with it?

In this instance, with this script, I read this whole script many, many times. I usually do that anyway, but, on this, it felt essential for me to read it a bunch of times. It wasn’t about just concentrating on my stuff, partially because it was so interesting. I just had such a good time reading it and thinking about it. Like you said, there’s a tonal thing, and I needed to have a sense of that in my head. I also feel like the character has a real awareness of Rob’s character, so I felt like I needed to know Rob’s character. Certainly, in my scenes, it all had to make crystal sense to me [Laughs].

[Laughs] So, when he says he has a fungus between his toes telling him to kill someone, does he mean that literally?

[Laughs] See, the funny thing talking about this character is that it’s the first time I’ve ever been reluctant to tell anybody what I was actually thinking of the character. God…it’s, like, I don’t even want to tell you! The only thing I will tell you, which I was thinking about, is that, yes, he does literally think that’s happening to him sometimes, but not all the time. I even say, whatever he says in the moment, is true. That’s constantly happening with the character and everybody else, in a weird way. Your ability to change reality is extraordinarily powerful. So, at the moment, he does think the thing between his toes is talking to him. I loved that line! I thought it was insane, but funny, at least I think so. The more serious I could do it, the funnier I thought it would be.

***

What about his towel?

See, I’m not going to tell ya. I cannot tell you that. I will tell you, I absolutely know everything about the towel, but I’m not going to tell you. I do feel it’s important for that character to be an enigma. [Laughs] I don’t mean to be challenging, but everyone asks me about the towel! It’s because I’m sure you have ideas about the towel, right?

Yeah. It’s almost like a safety sweater, something that makes him feel protected.

See? Great. Fantastic. Anything you’re going to say or think about the towel is going to work for me. I mean, I know what I thought about the towel! [Laughs]

[Laughs] It seems like you thought a lot about that towel.

I actually did. The only thing I will tell you is that, the name and the towel have something to do with each other. His fake name and the towel are connected. I did need to know that, because I have this towel on my head and I am suppose to do things with this towel. It was indicated that I would have to take that towel off and on again, so I thought I needed to know what it was or else I would be confused. I had to come up with something.

Does that happen often, where you have to apply meaning to something so small?

Sure. Usually they’re less bizarre than this and require less bizarre invention. There’s often things you come up with and invent for yourself. This was interesting, because it was so abnormal, but there was nothing normal about it. I had to come up with a totally logical explanation for something that made no sense, but would make perfect sense for that character.

Read the full interview HERE.

This entry was posted in Cosmopolis, Paul Giamatti and tagged , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Interview: Paul Giamatti talks tone, murderous toe fungus and dirty towels with Film School Rejects

  1. Jay says:

    a fungus for the rest of us: Benno’s 99%

    • deb24601 says:

      Haha Benno’s 99% *makes tshirts* Will you be able to get to Toronto for the encore presentation?

      • Jay says:

        No. Kids are too small to leave with people we don’t really know. I live vicariously through you and the other chaffeurs. That will be enough until I can get it on DVD. It is, afterall, how we Cronenberg fans have had to survive for many a year.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s